I forgot who it was, but a long time ago I played versus someone heads up who I thought was really good. I talked to my friends about it and they all thought he was terrible. I kept playing him and after a while I realized that he just had it every single hand. Poker is such a funny game where something like that happens.
Ivey, I think, has a better chance to adjust than durrrr does. Even if I had an edge versus him at the start I would still be worried.
So I feel like I would have an edge versus him no matter what. Versus Ivey I would be a little more concerned after about 10 to 15, hands. So durrrr is not as good at adjusting as you are? I was mad I actually did that. Honestly, it was cool to do but there was no real point to it. The way they set up the challenge made it impossible for me to play those at the same time.
About the challenge itself, he played the style he usually plays. I felt like he got slightly luckier than me but he also played a little bit better. Probably not. But when I played him it was very clear that he was always really fresh and thinking a lot.
The thing with someone as good as Isildur1, is that he can kind of get away with auto piloting a lot. It is a mistake not to always play your A-game but he still probably had an edge versus a lot of people he played. At the moment for sure, it definitely is. To be honest not really, when we played back in the day I won consistently other than PLO. Would you ever ask Jungleman for his opinion while a hand was going on? Or is that something you would morally decide not to do?
But for instance, it would be directly after sometimes. Based on what you just said, do you think that the Isilidur1 versus Brian Hastings thing was less of a deal as what it was made out to be? You have to expect that to be happening anyways. Sharing hand histories among poker players is something that is so normal. Would you ever consider doing something similar with your friends? I would rather just try to beat that player myself. When Jungleman and I played we knew how certain players played.
We would tell each other what we thought their leaks were, that was pretty normal. I would rather just beat him myself. Thankfully the level of play at PLO at the time was extremely low. I guess that somehow I already had some knowledge of the game and if you know simple math you could tell that people were making pretty big mistakes.
Was it more fun to reach the highest stakes at PLO because there was maybe more to the game? At high stakes PLO it was mostly 6-Max games that ran. You get to understand what people are doing quicker and you have to pay attention way more. Is it possible to be a successful poker player without being a degenerate in some way? I think you can but there comes a point where you must have an absolute disregard for money if you want to win. It was not very useful to me for some reason.
Do poker and the easy access to a lot of money, create a degenerate or do the biggest degenerates become the most successful poker players? The degenerates have better capabilities to play high stakes, just look at Isildur1. Have you been involved in any crazy degenerate action like prop bets? Nothing really unfortunately. If I ever did make a bet with someone it would not be for money but for having to do something stupid.
What would it be? Probably Super Smash Brothers laughs. Do you think you could ever go to work nine-to-five and live a regular life? It would be pretty hard to be honest. Thankfully I would never have to try to do that. I just enjoy the freedom of being able to do whatever I want much more than a set-in-stone nine-to-five job. One of the reasons I took a break from poker was because I was too naive. Bet Angebotscode. Tournament Results Online Poker Rooms Players in the News Poker on Television The World Series of Poker Poker Legal Issues Other Poker News Miscellaneous King Articles Who is URnotINdanger2?
Should I play hu or 6max? The main thing that I've been having trouble with in my NL game is balance. I feel like I am very unbalanced in certain spots. I was wondering how you guys go about balancing your range in different spots. Adjusting is one of the most important factors in poker. Balance is more important when you're thinking about the overall picture of your game. This becomes more clear if you are playing a LOT of tables and cannot adjust as well to each individual table.
Balance will protect you better from being exploited without you knowing it. However, if you can adjust and adjust often, exploitative play becomes more enticing. Randy "nanonoko" Lew. I have a Huge tilt problem. U guys, specially nano you seem to be tilt-less do something to control the tilt?
0コメント